alison aron

Human Engagement Map

World Map

HUMAN ENGAGEMENT MAP

MANAGER ASSESSMENT TOOL  ·  EMapb.01a
Scale 5 Excellent    4 Very Good    3 Good    2 Fair    1 Poor
5 Measures of Engagement
▼
P — Presence
How reliably does the employee show up — on time, every day, and engaged?
F — Focus
Is the employee spending their energy on the right work?
C — Connection
Does the employee actively invest in the people around them?
P — Productivity
Does the employee move work forward without being asked?
Q — Quality
Is the work worth doing again?
Data saves automatically in this browser. Use Export to back up your data, and Import to restore it on another device or browser.

HUMAN ENGAGEMENT MAP

ENGAGEMENT REPORT
Team Summary
Employee HEM Score ⓘ Status Slope Current Projected
Individual Engagement Profiles
Scale:  1 = Poor   2 = Fair   3 = Good   4 = Very Good   5 = Excellent 📈 Click to show measure trends
Team Overview
Team Performance  ·  All Employees
HEM Score by Employee
Monthly Average Trends

ⓘ How HEM Score is Calculated

HEM Score = Current avg + ½ × weighted trend adjustment
(P + F + C + P + Q) ÷ 5  →  most-recent month avg, adjusted by weighted trend
1
Rate each measure (1–5) for every month recorded. Each measure captures a distinct dimension of engagement.
2
Monthly Average: For each month, add all 5 measure scores and divide by 5 to get that month's engagement average.
3
HEM Score: Most-recent month's average, adjusted by half the exponentially weighted slope (recent months carry more weight). Clamped 1–5.
4
Score bands:  1.0–2.4 = Needs Attention  |  2.5–3.4 = Moderate  |  3.5–4.2 = Strong  |  4.3–5.0 = Excellent
P – Presence F – Focus C – Connection P – Productivity Q – Quality